Why doesn’t parent involvement help treat children with anxiety?

The Mental Elf | January 2022 | Why doesn’t parent involvement help treat children with anxiety?

The Mental Elf has produced a blog post which provides a summary of a research paper that reviews therapy targets, techniques and outcomes. The authors consider the following questions:

“If specific aspects of parenting link so clearly to youth anxiety, what do we make of the fact that involving parents more actively in treatment does not appear to improve outcomes?

Are we targeting the wrong family features, using the wrong strategies to get at them, or perhaps not addressing them with sufficient intensity?”

Highlights

•Family-focused treatments for anxiety vary in format and approach and it remains unclear whether they offer an advantage over individual child treatment.

•We used meta-analytic methods to examine the therapeutic approaches described in existing family interventions, whether they mapped to identified mechanisms, and the timeline along which they were measured.

•Of 11 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included a youth anxiety measure at pre- and post-treatment, only half included a family functioning measure at both pre- and post-treatment.

•Only a single study included anxiety measures at a mid-treatment time point, and none included parent measures at a mid-treatment time point.

•Findings are discussed in terms of design considerations and advancing the field of family intervention for youth anxiety

Abstract

Parent- and family-level correlates of youth anxiety are well-documented, and they highlight potential targets for family-focused intervention. Although family-based approaches for treating youth anxiety generally are considered efficacious for achieving symptom reduction, they vary in format and approach and it remains unclear whether they offer an advantage over individual child treatment. To better understand the current state of the evidence, we used meta-analytic methods to examine the therapeutic approaches described in existing family interventions for child and adolescent anxiety, whether they mapped to the major mechanisms proposed in the literature, and the timeline along which relevant parent/family variables were measured. We examined how these mechanism-focused family interventions performed in RCTs relative to individual child CBT and whether they shifted symptoms and relevant parenting behaviors. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared individual cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) to CBT+ a family component (CBT + FAM) and included a youth anxiety measure at pre- and post-treatment; only half of these ( n equal to 6) also included a parent/family functioning measure at both pre- and post-treatment (across both primary and secondary outcome papers). Only a single study included anxiety measures at a mid-treatment time point, and none included parent measures at a mid-treatment time point. Findings are discussed in terms of design considerations and advancing the field of family intervention for youth anxiety.

Family Intervention for Child and Adolescent Anxiety: A Meta-analytic Review of Therapy Targets, Techniques, and Outcomes [primary paper]

Mental Elf Why doesn’t parent involvement help treat children with anxiety?

Mental Elf: Antidepressants, autism diagnosis & self-harm [video]

Mental Elf | 30 November 2021 | Antidepressants, autism diagnosis & self-harm

The Mental Elf is producing ‘Golden Nuggets’ which are videos that present key ideas from mental health research that professionals can use in practice.

This ‘Golden Nugget’ covers antidepressants, autism diagnosis & self-harm.

CBT for youth anxiety and depression: satisfaction guaranteed?

The Mental Elf | November 2021 | CBT for youth anxiety and depression: satisfaction guaranteed?

This blog post from the Mental Elf summarises the findings of a recent paper that investigated the reporting quality of treatment satisfaction in identified studies, with the second objective being to investigate the level of treatment satisfaction with cognitive behavioral therapy among children and adolescents with anxiety and depression.

CBT for youth anxiety and depression: satisfaction guaranteed?

Treatment satisfaction with cognitive-behavioral therapy among children and adolescents with anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-synthesis [primary paper]

Choque Olsen, N. et al 2021 | Treatment satisfaction with cognitive-behavioral therapy among children and adolescents with anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-synthesis | Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy | Vol31| 2 |  June 2021| P.147-191

Abstract

Recent reviews estimated that the worldwide prevalence of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents is increasing, which has led to rising demands for treatment. Studies on clinical outcomes have shown positive effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in children and adolescents with anxiety and depression. However, there is a limited body of studies on the perspectives and experiences of the treatment participants. The objective of this review was to investigate treatment satisfaction with CBT among children and adolescents with anxiety and depression. We focused on the reporting quality of the treatment satisfaction and experiences of participants in the selected studies. From 1379 identified studies, 35 were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of a meta-synthesis and proportional meta-analysis suggest moderate to high treatment satisfaction with CBT in depressed and anxious children and adolescents. The included studies showed moderate to good reporting quality on treatment satisfaction. The measurements used varied, indicating a risk of different evaluations under the concept of “treatment satisfaction”. The common topics measured for treatment satisfaction were acceptability, treatment usefulness, alliance, barriers, recommendation, and others, leading to uncertainty concerning generalization. A wide variety of measures were used, indicating the need for standardized measures for treatment satisfaction in future research.


Association of Psychiatric Disorders With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 #Covid19RftLks

The Mental Elf | July 2021| Association of Psychiatric Disorders With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19

This blog post from The Mental Elf highlights the findings of a retrospective cohort study which looked at whether a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, mood disorder, or anxiety disorder is associated with mortality in patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 in more than 7 000 patients.

The Mental Elf reports that  most notable finding from this study is that people with psychiatric illness, specifically schizophrenia, may be at a greater risk of dying from COVID-19, even after controlling for age, race, and various medical issues. In fact, the results indicate that people with schizophrenia are the second highest risk group for dying from COVID-19, after older age. The blog post also elucidates the study’s strengths, limitations and implications for research for this study’s specific population.

Nemani, K. et al | 2021 |  Association of psychiatric disorders with mortality among patients with COVID-19JAMA psychiatry78 |4| P. 380-386.

The primary paper is available from JAMA Network Association of Psychiatric Disorders With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19

Death from COVID-19: should we be prioritising people with schizophrenia for vaccination?